tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2783763806568832522.post887969320943542763..comments2009-07-18T16:05:51.435-04:00Mary Abrahamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07437605925715236752KMAdvice@gmail.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2783763806568832522.post-38742958034640148462009-01-12T04:40:00.000-05:002009-01-12T04:40:00.000-05:00The ReadWriteWeb's cyn.in Desktop review might help you to understand how micro-blogging could (and perhaps should) work for businesses, <BR/><BR/>http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/new_from_cynapse_activity_streams_on_the_company_desktop.phpAnilhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07157247107530253042noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2783763806568832522.post-4222674008501129602008-09-17T19:12:00.000-04:002008-09-17T19:12:00.000-04:00Samuel - <BR/><BR/>I'm not opposed to Twitter or any other new technology. My point is that we need to be sure that the technology fits in with existing business processes and practices, rather than creating a new burden for lawyers. Most lawyers don't blog (and aren't interested in blogging, according to recent reports). So we're going to have to have another sensible use for Twitter within a law firm.<BR/><BR/>- MaryMary Abrahamhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07437605925715236752noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2783763806568832522.post-52915005102298903922008-09-17T15:01:00.000-04:002008-09-17T15:01:00.000-04:00Aren't you a little too warn-y? ;-) I agree with you people shouldn't jump on every new technology out there. But I'd rather read a post on how lawyers can take advantage of enterprise twitter. Are lawyers using it? And how are they?<BR/>In my experience I see (enterprise) twitter is very interesting for those that don't want to or can't blog. For people that find blogging difficult, microblogging can be wonderful. And, of course, we have to clearly distinguish twitter from IM and email. To me there is a clear distinction.Samuel Driessenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14145886833443377887noreply@blogger.com